Re: Non responsive maintainer: cheese ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



sorry for being offline. had some longer trouble in real life and am now
wading through lots of mails which piled up since some weeks.

pushed that package.

what is the correct way for being unavailable?
is a vacation message ok, or would we spam our mailinglists?
as far as i remember vacation would leave mails from vacation-lists
alone, though.

josef

On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 13:33 +0200, Pierre-Yves wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 12:30 +0100, Mark Chappell wrote:
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
> > 
> > It takes three weeks which can be frustrating, the initial "can we
> > push this update to testing" might count as the initial ticket
> > creation, dropping it down to 2 weeks from here...
> 
> If we include the absence of reaction in this review:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=585817
> (last comment on Mai 08th) then we are over these 3 weeks.
> 
> 
> Pierre


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux