On 07/02/2010 10:05 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 07/02/2010 01:23 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> The Petr's are apparent newbies/newcomers. >> >> They were granted access to all perl-packages, because they are @RH. >> Probably because it is their paid job to work on these packages. > > I am not aware of the specifics here. I am mostly familiar with it. > Fedora's sponsorship model allows > any sponsor to approve a new person to become a package maintainer . If > there is a process violation, There was: These people are apparent new-comers and have been granted access to several 100s (in the order of >> 1000) packages. > file it with FESCo but as the ongoing > other thread related to this topic, less rigid idea of "ownership" is > the right mind set. The problem is not ownership the problem is "qualification" and "double standards". That said, I can't avoid having to agree to Josephine. The Petr's hardly would have been granted this amount of CVS access if they had not been @RH. Ralf -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
