On 6/30/2010 5:35 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:25:37 +0100, Peter wrote: > >>> libjpeg is split into libjpeg-turbo and libjpeg-turbo-utils, Obsoletes >>> libjpeg is already added to libjpeg-turbo-utils. I don't know why >>> Rich's package failed to build on koji, the problem is a bit weird. >>> Among 5 packages which require libjpeg explicitly, only >>> java-1.6.0-openjdk will be used as a BR, however Rich's packages is >>> irrelevant to java. FYI, provides libjpeg is also add to >>> libjpeg-turbo-utils now, I don't know if it can solve the file >>> conflicts. >> Why would you add the obsolete to the -utils. In most cases you >> probably only need the libs so it wouldn't pull in the utils package >> and hence wouldn't obsolete it. > libjpeg contained libs _and_ tools. I played with it a little bit more last night, the problem occurred when my package pulled in graphviz. Graphviz has a BR:libjpeg-devel, and makes no mention of libjpeg-utils. It only relies on libjpeg for the libraries, and doesn't need any of the utils (my package only uses libjpeg's libraries as well). I guess since libjpeg-turbo didn't obsolete libjpeg, graphviz was quite happy pulling in libjpeg instead of libjpeg-turbo. Rich -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
