Re: Evolution update in F13

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/26/2010 07:33 AM, Adam Miller wrote:
> Sounds like it might need to be. Maybe push stable requests with -2 karma to
> some list that requires investigation and possibly a +3 (or other agreed
> upon number) proventesters karma to go stable?

Would you mind to explain how could have happened:

# yum update
...
---> Package evolution.x86_64 0:2.30.2-1.fc13 set to be updated
--> Processing Dependency: libedataserver-1.2.so.11()(64bit) for 
package: gnome-panel-2.30.0-1.fc13.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: libedataserver-1.2.so.11()(64bit) for 
package: glabels-2.2.8-1.fc13.x86_64
---> Package evolution-data-server.x86_64 0:2.30.2-2.fc13 set to be updated
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Package: glabels-2.2.8-1.fc13.x86_64 (@updates)
            Requires: libedataserver-1.2.so.11()(64bit)
            Removing: evolution-data-server-2.30.1-2.fc13.x86_64 (@fedora)
Error: Package: gnome-panel-2.30.0-1.fc13.x86_64 (@fedora)
            Requires: libedataserver-1.2.so.11()(64bit)
            Removing: evolution-data-server-2.30.1-2.fc13.x86_64 (@fedora)

To me this is a clear case of package-push which should not have 
happened and is not related to karma votes at all.

Ralf
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux