Re: Evolution update in F13

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sounds like it might need to be. Maybe push stable requests with -2 karma to some list that requires investigation and possibly a +3 (or other agreed upon number) proventesters karma to go stable?

Just a thought.

-AdamM (From Android)

On Jun 25, 2010 6:27 PM, "Jesse Keating" <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Can anybody tell me what went wrong with this update?  It was submitted
at 15:09 on 06-23, then made it into testing at 16:19 on 06-24 and was
submitted for stable two hours later.  Between that submission and the
push to stable (push to stable happened at 18:09 on 06-25) numerous
negative karma came in due to broken deps.  The update went out anyway,
and now we have a mess of broken updates on a critical path package, and
have to scramble to fix it with more updates, on a Friday.

Can anybody help me understand the scenario here?  Should we start
filtering out push requests that have more than -2 karma?

- --
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkwlO0cACgkQ4v2HLvE71NXVxwCfS59qPC/vUPT1rEIMrhMRijDL
C9gAnj8FKdjdPHqL4lZPFWiAMKWsEXma
=OHPB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux