On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:39:57AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 06/22/2010 11:36 AM, H. Guémar wrote: > > Just one thing, the title is misleading since Django 1.2.x is not an > > "unsafe" version. > > Well, it's unsafe to drop it into a stable distribution since it's not > completely backwards-compatible. > > > So what's the plan ? The update was also pushed in previous release like F12. > > > > > > Best regards, > > H. > > Unfortunately, now that it's been pushed to stable, we're stuck with it. > Probably we need to have the Transifex maintainer rebuild with a > Conflicts: Django >= 1.2 so that it will keep yum from upgrading into a > broken setup. > > I've rebuilt ReviewBoard today for Fedora 13 with a compatible version. > I don't like it when we have to resort to this but now that the packages have gone out to the stable repository we may need to do this:: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python_Eggs#Multiple_Versions Parallel Django 1.1 and 1.2 stacks. Use either sys.path or setuptools __requires__ to pull in the correct version of django depending on the app. -Toshio
Attachment:
pgps2GwauZQXK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
