Re: Unsafe Django version being pushed to stable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/22/2010 11:36 AM, H. Guémar wrote:
> Just one thing, the title is misleading since Django 1.2.x is not an
> "unsafe" version.

Well, it's unsafe to drop it into a stable distribution since it's not 
completely backwards-compatible.

> So what's the plan ? The update was also pushed in previous release like F12.
>
>
> Best regards,
> H.

Unfortunately, now that it's been pushed to stable, we're stuck with it. 
Probably we need to have the Transifex maintainer rebuild with a 
Conflicts: Django >= 1.2 so that it will keep yum from upgrading into a 
broken setup.

I've rebuilt ReviewBoard today for Fedora 13 with a compatible version.

-- 
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761

Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux