On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 10:58:15AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >On 06/09/2010 10:48 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> >>> Well the only person I see mentioning quality is Kevin. And for some >>> reason he is expecting it immediately >>> >> You can't claim that there are "shortcomings in our testing" (the exact >> words Luke used!) without a metric of quality. A shortcoming in testing >> means less testing was done than needed. If the packages have good quality, >> that means more testing is NOT needed, no matter what the actual amount of >> testing was. >> > >Packages without any testing is of unknown quality. If someone doesn't >test them before pushing, users are unknowingly playing that role. That is true if you are making the assumption that the package maintainer did no testing themselves. I would hope that isn't the common case. josh -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
