tor 2010-06-03 klockan 19:31 +0100 skrev Alex Hudson: > On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 12:29 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > > On 06/03/2010 11:54 AM, Iain Arnell wrote: > > > And slightly weird that it's okay for Red Hat to distribute it > > > themselves, both commercially and as open source from jboss.org, but > > > it's questionable for Fedora. > > > > I can't speak on what Red Hat does on a larger scale. I do know that it > > is important to me and Fedora that we do it properly, or not at all. > > If everyone else is distributing JBoss, though, that calls into question > whether it's Fedora doing it "properly". > > Worrying about a set of rights which are unwaivable seems on the face of > it to be exhibiting an abundance of over-caution, and it seems > particularly sad that Fedora is losing out having to refrain from > distributing another Red Hat-sponsored project. It's not sad. It means the Fedora project will do the work to clean up a mess which most other don't even see. It's problematic, in a way, sure, but "sad" is really not the right word. /Alexander -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
