On Wed, 26.05.10 17:41, Bill Nottingham (notting@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > James Findley (sixy@xxxxxxx) said: > > Actually the blog post is proposing exactly that, as I read it. And it > > seems not only that lots of other people read it the same way, but some > > even agree with it. > > > > So I'm not sure I see how this is going off into the weeds - if > > transitioning some/all initscripts to C is a genuine goal of the author > > of the project, on which he is not prepared to budge, then that is > > likely to have bearing on its adoption into fedora, and rightly so. > > What I took from it is that code like this from rc.sysinit: > > ... > if [ ! -e /proc/mounts ]; then > mount -n -t proc /proc /proc > mount -n -t sysfs /sys /sys >/dev/null 2>&1 > fi > ... > > really doesn't need to be there. If you're redesigning the init system, > rather than keeping compatibility with ancient stupid sysvinit, there's > no reason that shell code is needed for this; init should Just Do It when > it starts. In fact, I'm pretty sure recent upstart releases do the same > thing. I'm sure we can find more examples if we look. Yes, this is exactly what I meant. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering Red Hat, Inc. lennart [at] poettering [dot] net http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4 -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
