On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 09:05:31AM -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote: > On 05/23/2010 04:19 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Lennart Poettering wrote: > >> So far response from the community has been very positive, but we didn't > >> have a fedora-devel discussion about this yet, so we'll have to see > >> whether we can somehow make the broader community as enthusiastic about > >> the whole idea as I am. ;-) > > > > I, for one, think systemd should be the default ASAP. > > Perhaps the first time I can recall that we have agreed. ;) > > ~spot Any particular reason on either of your parts? Just about everything in systemd is either set to be in upstart (simpler dependency syntax, xinetd-style service activation) or was discarded by it years ago (cgroups are a dead end). The assumption that just because its new means its more advanced is in this case a bit misguided. --CJD > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
