On Sun, 23.05.10 02:40, Rahul Sundaram (metherid@xxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > On 05/23/2010 02:36 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > > (And as a side note: systemd by default puts a tmpfs to both /var/run > > and /var/lock). > > > > So do you plan on getting it by default for Fedora 14? :-) Well, I am certainly planning to have a package for it in F14. But whether we can have it as default is to be seen. ATM everything looks rosy. I just finished porting over all F13 installed-by-default daemons to socket activation, and a few more (and the patches are good enough to be upstreamable). I'll publish the numbers of a 100% socket-activated boot soon. Codewise only very little is missing to be fully ready for Fedora (in fact selinux support is the only item really mattering on my todo list). So far response from the community has been very positive, but we didn't have a fedora-devel discussion about this yet, so we'll have to see whether we can somehow make the broader community as enthusiastic about the whole idea as I am. ;-) (some of the systemd-related work in other projects already hit rawhide btw, e.g. in udev) A little bit down the road I'll make my mind up whether I plan to suggest as a default for F14, and then propose that on fedora-devel and FESCO. Stay tuned. It would certainly be a shame though if other distros would ship systemd by default before we do. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering Red Hat, Inc. lennart [at] poettering [dot] net http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4 -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
