On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Lennart Poettering <mzerqung@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, 23.05.10 02:40, Rahul Sundaram (metherid@xxxxxxxxx) wrote: > >> >> On 05/23/2010 02:36 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: >> > >> > (And as a side note: systemd by default puts a tmpfs to both /var/run >> > and /var/lock). >> > >> >> So do you plan on getting it by default for Fedora 14? :-) > > Well, I am certainly planning to have a package for it in F14. But > whether we can have it as default is to be seen. > > ATM everything looks rosy. I just finished porting over all F13 > installed-by-default daemons to socket activation, and a few more (and > the patches are good enough to be upstreamable). I'll publish the > numbers of a 100% socket-activated boot soon. Codewise only very little > is missing to be fully ready for Fedora (in fact selinux support is the > only item really mattering on my todo list). > > So far response from the community has been very positive, but we didn't > have a fedora-devel discussion about this yet, so we'll have to see > whether we can somehow make the broader community as enthusiastic about > the whole idea as I am. ;-) > > (some of the systemd-related work in other projects already hit rawhide > btw, e.g. in udev) > > A little bit down the road I'll make my mind up whether I plan to > suggest as a default for F14, and then propose that on > fedora-devel and FESCO. Stay tuned. If its possible to turn it on in a spin for testing I would quite happily volunteer the Moblin/Meego spin to be a test platform for F-14 if its decided its too risky to do for the main platform. In terms of services its very minimal so it might be a good starter. Peter -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
