On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 23:18:40 +0200, Rudi Chiarito wrote: [mach] > > No. It's in fedora.us already in the "stable" repository (much to the > > disliking of some people) and the fedora.us build system uses a modified > > What are these people's objections? Instability? The use of apt-rpm? > Security? Anything else? Some issues collected here: http://tinyurl.com/2hbgy > My point is: get mach, rpmlint and equivalents into FC (not FE). rpmlint is not bullet-proof and reports several false positives and misses many packaging mistakes. If it isn't customized--as the fedora.us rpmlint is a bit (or also take a look at http://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1788 )--it is less helpful.
