On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 20:21 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > Are there any plans to have Red Hat Legal look at the patent-freeness of > > WebM before we leap to include it? We don't take other people's word for > > it in most cases of potential patent problems, so I don't think it > > follows that we would just take Google's word for it in this case... > > According to a comment on the actual bug [1] RH Legal has already reviewed it. Thanks, I missed that one. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
