On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 11:21:01AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Peter Robinson wrote: > > I don't see when the support lands in F-13 there couldn't be press > > statements about it, just because it appears after the release doesn't > > mean its not significant and isn't worth making a statement about. > > In fact this is a big failure of our feature process, but whenever I have > brung this up in FESCo, the reaction of the other folks there was to > threaten banning that kind of updates entirely. :-/ > > <SARCASM>Yeah, wonderful idea, let's allow everyone else to advertise WebM > support months before us</SARCASM> just because the upstream release date > happened to be at the worst possible point of our release cycle. :-/ > > Adding features in updates is needed. Our feature process needs to > accomodate this. The current process is broken. > > Kevin Kofler > I'm not sure we need to push it all the way into F13, but a special WebM repo would be nice so this can be easily tested by any user on F13 systems in preparation for full 'support' in F14. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
