On 14 May 2010 06:42, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:23:10PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote: >>On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 15:53 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: >> >>> If we combine that with requiring valid bug numbers before negative karma can >>> be applied, then I'd be ok with that. Until we require that, there are way to >>> many corner cases where something like that isn't going to work well. >> >>Really? I don't think there's *that* many cases where a negative piece >>of karma is filed between the submission and the push which you'd want >>to ignore. And even in the rare cases when that happens, if we warn or >>even unsubmit the update, it's not like you can't do anything about it. >>If we make it a warning...ignore the warning. If we make it withdraw the >>update...just submit it again. I'm having a hard time seeing that fall >>apart. > I don't know about real statistics of these kinds of reports, but In case it is really a big number I would suggest to increase the gap between submitting so that maintainer gets a week or few more days to decide (reach to his mail and take a decision, whether to un-submit the push). -- Rakesh Pandit https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rakesh freedom, friends, features, first -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
