On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 15:53 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > If we combine that with requiring valid bug numbers before negative karma can > be applied, then I'd be ok with that. Until we require that, there are way to > many corner cases where something like that isn't going to work well. Really? I don't think there's *that* many cases where a negative piece of karma is filed between the submission and the push which you'd want to ignore. And even in the rare cases when that happens, if we warn or even unsubmit the update, it's not like you can't do anything about it. If we make it a warning...ignore the warning. If we make it withdraw the update...just submit it again. I'm having a hard time seeing that fall apart. I don't really mind requiring bug numbers for negative karma (though, if anything, I reckon that'd have *more* problematic corner cases in itself). But I'm not sure it's really necessary for this. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
