Re: Reasons for hall monitoring

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:18:54AM +0200, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> Dne 10.5.2010 06:54, Ralf Corsepius napsal(a):
> > Have you ever talked to Ubuntu/openSUSE users and listened to their
> > replies when telling them you are using Fedora?
> >
> > You will hear answers along the line of too much inconvenience to get
> > multimedia working, too unstable (in the sense of low MTBF), "I tried
> > Fedora once, but had suffered from xxxx-failures", no usable
> > system-config GUI, ...
> 
> I heard these arguments many times and some of them are fair, but some 
> of them just are not ... how less difficult it could be to get 
> multimedia working than clicking on two links 
> (http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/rpmfusion-free-release-stable.noarch.rpm 
> and 
> http://download1.rpmfusion.org/nonfree/fedora/rpmfusion-nonfree-release-stable.noarch.rpm) 
> and agreeing on the inserting new repository?

and then you get the idea you also want to use nice synaptics package manager
and your system is ruined with a few clicks.

I have opend bugs on that in redhat and rpmfusion which apper untouched since than.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566917

Richard
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux