On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I use the non-responsive process or active nagging quite a lot, since I > often stumble upon such packages (it already happend twice to youtube-dl > that the current maintainer did not have enough time). Thankfully the > start of the non-responsive process often leads to maintainers realising > that they have not enough time, so that they orphan their packages. It > seems to me that mentioning the non-responsive process is needed to get > some attention. But do we know how often it gets used say every month, every quarter, every 6 months? Are we talking about 1% of the devel packageset being impacted in a six month period by the AWOL process? Again "quite a lot" is being used in a very qualitative way. We aren't talking about tens of people like you using it heavily are we? How much of the orphaning activity is prompted by AWOL versus proactive self-assessment? -jef -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
