2010/5/6 Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora@xxxxxxxxx> > > On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Karel Zak wrote: > > On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 05:46:21PM -0400, Brian Pepple wrote: > >> On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 23:22 +0200, Matěj Cepl wrote: > >> > Dne 6.5.2010 12:28, Karel Zak napsal(a): > >> > >> Thank you for pointing out yet another undemocratic policy passed by one of > >> > > > >> > > +1 The Hall Monitor Policy is cancer. > >> > > >> > +1000 it feels to me like in a bad old Communism when the open debate > >> > was allowed only when it didn't touch the leading role of the Communist > >> > Party. I really don't think anybody in this thread said anything so > >> > sacrilegious that the thread should be terminated. > >> > >> Normally, I'd be against it killing a thread, but the thread that > >> started this discussion had already been done awhile back and this new > >> thread added *nothing* new to the discussion. Frankly, it was more > > > > This all is your subjective opinion. There is not objective and > > unbiased way how evaluate any discussion, it's unmeasurable. > > I don't agree. There are logical ways to measure this. e.g. > > N people participate in a thread. > -> (N/2)+1 of them complains to the moderator > -> the thread gets closed. > > But since the number of complaints in this case was 3 only, closing > the thread did not make any sense. I believe that these long discussions will end only when there is a better way of communication (and interaction) between the various contributors of the Fedora Project, Fedora Board and FESCO. Anything that diminishes that sense of "we decide, you do." -- Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
