On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Orcan Ogetbil wrote: >> Hmm, this is what I did this a couple times, i.e. I forward the >> backtrace to upstream without including any other information, since >> the user does not provide any. >> >> What I receive from upstream is that they need more info. Then I go >> back to the user asking once more to get information to reproduce the >> bug. The user does not respond again. >> >> What do I do? > > You close the bug as INSUFFICIENT_DATA. It's all you can do. > so all that work and time that I spend to carry information goes to trash. This is a highly inefficient way of handling bugs. Can we just disable abrt on Fedora until it figures how to file bugs upstream? What is the procedure to propose this? Does this have to go through FESCo? Orcan -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
