Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> An average user wants a stable, working software distribution, with
> prompt patches and software enhancements. Since in general those are
> conflicting requirements, the Fedora community has to apply engineering
> judgement on what is the appropriate velocity of updates. I personally
> like the processes and infrastructure that Fedora built to manage the
> updates, even though I have seen that they don't prevent broken software
> from getting in. My conclusion is to make it better,
> not jettison it.
The thing is, the Board's "vision" is NOT to keep things as they are, they
want to make us much more conservative.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
