On 04/26/2010 01:41 AM, Chris Tyler wrote: > On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 00:33 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >> On 04/26/2010 12:18 AM, Chris Tyler wrote: >> >>> Let's not be brash. If we want to ship TB with one small patch, it's a >>> simple matter of asking. >>> >> If it was so simple, why haven't we done it already? >> > We did, with Firefox and Pango. > Well, I was referring to Thunderbird and the fix for the crash that is part of this thread obviously. >> What about patches to use system libraries? >> > I'm sure they'd love to receive 'em! > > Aren't they aware of the existing patches already? > Also, back to the original TB bug -- the reason this wasn't a top > priority upstream was that it wasn't showing up in the Moz crashstats > (they only had one report). We need to finish the work of tying our > crash reports into their system, something they've been asking for since > well before ABRT. > Till then, how do we get them to prioritize downstream crashes? Alternatively are they willing to let Fedora patch it without requiring a rebranding? They could be be more flexible. Rahul -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
