Re: Request for Comments: Fedora Project Contributor Agreement Draft (Replacement for Fedora Individual Contributor License Agreement)

[Sir Gallantmon (ニール・ゴンパ) <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx>]

But it should be explicitly stated anyway. Legalese isn't English.

Note: IANAL

On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 4:28 PM, Matt McCutchen <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 16:15 -0500, charles zeitler wrote:
> i looked at this (and the MIT license) didn't see any explicit reference
> to source code! (e.g. , that it must be made available.)

Indeed.  For an MIT licensing regime to be considered "free", the
original author must provide the source.  But being non-copyleft, the
license does not require distributors of derived works to provide
source.

I can't imagine Fedora accepting a contribution in binary form, so I
believe this is a non-issue.

--
Matt

--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel