On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 16:15 -0500, charles zeitler wrote: > i looked at this (and the MIT license) didn't see any explicit reference > to source code! (e.g. , that it must be made available.) Indeed. For an MIT licensing regime to be considered "free", the original author must provide the source. But being non-copyleft, the license does not require distributors of derived works to provide source. I can't imagine Fedora accepting a contribution in binary form, so I believe this is a non-issue. -- Matt -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
