On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 21:18 +0200, drago01 wrote: > On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 8:13 PM, Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > [..] > > In the near future, we will re-enable the bodhi auto-obsoletes > > code so we won't hit this problem. > > I hope it is smarter than it was in the past. > > Lets say you have > update1: foo-1.0-1 and bar-1.1-2 > You add > update2: foo-1.0-2 > > update1 is obsolete .... which means bar-1.1-2 is "lost" ... i.e it > should obsolete by package _not_ by update. It's smarter, in that it'll just ignore this case. It'll only match on exact package lists, just different versions. -- Jesse Keating RHCE (http://jkeating.livejournal.com) Fedora Project (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JesseKeating) GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub) identi.ca (http://identi.ca/jkeating)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
