On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 20:13 +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 08.04.2010, 13:37 -0400 schrieb Bill Nottingham: > > Christoph Wickert (christoph.wickert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > > > Suggestion: > > > GNOME and KDE use their agents, everything else, for example window > > > managers like icewm or openbox, gets lxpolkit. > > > > I'd honestly prefer they use the GNOME one (maintained closer to the > > source, etc.) unless there are speicfic problems with it. > > So far there are no problems, but when GConf2 or others get pulled in, > we might get into trouble. People are not using a lightweight WM in > order to install half of GNOME. Is there any particular reason polkit-gnome-authentication-agent couldn't be polkit-gtk-authentication-agent instead, and explicitly be designed to be GNOME dependency-free and hence suitable for other GTK-ish desktops? It seems a bit odd to mushroom off three different implementations of what's really a fairly simple widget... -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
