Am Donnerstag, den 08.04.2010, 14:22 -0400 schrieb Matthias Clasen: > On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 14:19 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote: > > > > On Thu, 8 Apr 2010, Christoph Wickert wrote: > > > > >>> 3. lxpolkit will be pulled in anyway due to the shortest name. > > >> > > >> That's not a useful decision rationale. > > > > > > I never said it is a useful decision rationale, it's something we cannot > > > avoid. I agree it's not useful, but please address your complainants to > > > the yum developers. > > > > > > Let me repeat what I already said in my previous mail: I don't mind > > > polkit-gnome as default agent, but > > > * I'm afraid that yum will choose lxpolkit > > > * I'm afraid polkit-gnome will have more deps in the future > > > * we cannot yet use OnlyShowIn=LXDE > > > > > > I'm all ears - tell me another way of how we should know that of 3 items > > one should be chosen over the others? > > > > One interesting criterium might be 'pulls in the least uninstalled > deps'. That would probably handle a lot of cases like the one at hand > nicely. +1, that's what I was just about to suggest. When I look into the critical path list, I see that there are also Xfce packages in there. This is due to xfce4-notifyd and notification-daemon both providing "desktop-notification-daemon". At the point where xfce4-notifd gets pulled in, the notification-daemon and it's deps were already processed, so I don't understand why yum adds another 5 packages added (xfce4-notifyd, libsexy, xfconf, libxfce4util and libxfcegui4). Regards, Christoph -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
