On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 01:09:51PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 14:56 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > > Till Maas wrote: > > > Maybe it would be enough to somehow store the information in Bugzilla, > > > e.g. using a flag for each supported release or some Whiteboard > > > Keywords, and then implement another Bugzilla Frontend that uses the > > > XML-RPC interface of Bugzilla to provide a Frontend that can be better > > > used for Fedora. > > > > *ding* *ding* *ding* Correct. > > > > Check out a Firefox or Thunderbird BZ flags for a good example. Properly > > adding some Fedora flags should not affect RHEL. > > This still smells like a messy workaround to me. Not only the web > interface is used to access Bugzilla. We'd have to patch everything else > - python-bugzilla, Fedora Community, etc - to properly 'interpret' the > flags. But hey, it'd be better than nothing, if someone wants to do the > work... Any change from the current situation will require changes in the dependent tools to interpret whatever is used for a new workflow. E.g. if bugs are cloned, that the tools should also identify the bugs as cloned ones. Regards Till
Attachment:
pgpM8APCKPiHk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
