On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 14:11 +0200, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > On Monday 29 March 2010 14:03:51 Yaakov Nemoy wrote: > > 2010/3/29 Michał Piotrowski <mkkp4x4@xxxxxxxxx>: > > > 2010/3/29 Oliver Falk <oliver@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > >> I had similar issues already and I totally agree with Christoph! > > >> The maintainer should not redirect the bugreporter to the upstream > > >> bugreporting plattform. I already have plenty of accounts on upstream > > >> bugzillas because of exactly this... > > > > > > I don't see any problem here if KDE SIG just declare "we don't fix KDE > > > bugs, we just update packages". > > > > > > They are not KDE developers, so they don't know how to fix these bugs. > > > > This response regardless, as a downstream user of a package, if i > > report a bug, it's nice to know if it's going to be fixed in a current > > release or not. Until the upstream bugfix lands in a package > > downstream, downstream should leave the bug open. > > Current Bugzilla policy says CLOSED as UPSTREAM is correct resolution. It's > just terminology - I would prefer another one - like just UPSTREAM status, or > ON_DEV UPSTREAM or something similar. CLOSED UPSTREAM does not mean that > nobody cares! It's still tracked! There's an 'Upstream' keyword you can use instead of the UPSTREAM resolution. The choice of which to use is currently left up to maintainer discretion. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
