Re: Rawhide signatures

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 03:45, Colin Walters <walters@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 12:21 -0400, Elliot Lee wrote:
> > There is a Fedora rawhide key (key ID 1CDDBCA9 I believe), but it's
> > really not practical right now to sign the packages, because the rawhide
> > push is completely automated, and signing requires manually entering a
> > password.
>
> Well you can certainly provide the passphrase programatically, something
> like:
>
> echo "my passphrase" 1>&3 | gpg --passphrase-fd=3 ...

Why not just have a GPG key with no pass-phrase?  I've just done a quick test 
and it seems that gpg 1.2.4 does not prompt for a pass-phrase if the key was 
created without one.

There seems to be no benefit to having a pass-phrase on a key that's used for 
automatic operation as anyone who can get the secret key can get the 
pass-phrase in the same manner.

-- 
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/   My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/  Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/    Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/  My home page



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux