On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 23:12 +0200, Florian La Roche wrote: > > So as an alternative, I'd like to move autopoint (and probably more > > development tools) into gettext-devel. See bug #126071. This brings up > > the main point: a lot of packages presently BuildRequire: gettext, and I > > think all of them will need to change to gettext-devel. This is the > > list from rawhide: > > I think this exactly shows why it does not make sense to list buildreqs > in too much detail. gettext/texinfo/auto*/libtool etc all should be > required elsewhere. So you are advocating leaving gettext/gettext-devel as-is, and adding Requires: cvs to the gettext package? Or are you advocating changing packages that use autopoint to BuildRequire cvs manually? Or something else?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
