Re: More bad dependencies

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 07:08:22PM -0400, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 02:18:27PM -0400, John Thacker wrote:
> > Ah, yes, another catch.
> > Also, does anyone know why the openobex package requires glib?
> > 
> 
> glib isnt just graphical - openobx uses the other classes in glib. It might
> work with glib2, not investigated

So, ldd doesn't show any dependency, rpmbuild doesn't pick it up automatically, and 
I noticed this in its Changelog near the top:

<snip>
2002-10-28  Marcel Holtmann  <marcel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

	* Remove GLib dependencies.
	* Remove default prefix statement.
	* Fix workaround for Bluetooth support, again.
	* Replace OBEX_TRANS_CUST with OBEX_TRANS_CUSTOM.
</snip>

The only glib dependency in the RPM is explicit, so I was thinking that it might
be another case of the package specifying a dependency that went away.

John Thacker



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux