Re: Stable Release Updates types proposal (was Re: Fedora Board Meeting Recap 2010-03-11)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Sonntag, den 14.03.2010, 19:33 +0100 schrieb Mathieu Bridon:
> Some others arrive and say hi, their first update (the 300MB one you
> get when installing 2 months after release) breaks something, they
> leave (some will not even finish downloading such a huge amount and
> leave).
> 
> Finally, even long time users can grow tired of having to fiddle with
> their system after an update, and leave, even if they haven't until
> now.

I'm really puzzled. 

The group which desires "more stable" releases heavily doubts the
reliability of Adams poll.

The same proponents heavily claim "broken updates", one would have to
fix one's system after *each* update, ... (see above). 

I guess: We don't have any valid statistics about it, either!

(And given my personal experiences: There must be another distro named
Fedora around, which is updatable in most cases without any issues. I'll
try to find out, where I got my Fedora from ...)


Peter



-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux