On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 10:44 PM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> Here is where we have a definition problem. To me, unbaked stuff is >> things that haven't had a good month of testing if its a large change >> (a couple of days if its a small one). > > If you count all the testing done on prereleases, KDE 4.4.0 actually had > much MORE than a month of testing before being pushed. Even if you count > only the stable release, it got more than 2 weeks of total testing before > the stable push. But the changes between the RCs and the final were fairly > small. > > So please don't overgeneralize claiming all the feature updates which are > getting pushed are "unbaked". Kevin, I am only going to respond once because it is clear you don't really read, you just shoot from your hip and you have not a single iota of compromise. You just inferred a whole lot into my post. I never said anything about KDE in this post. I don't use it enough to be able to talk about it. I gave a definition of what I thought unbaked was... nothing more, nothing less. I am done trying to have a conversation here... *plunk* -- Stephen J Smoogen. Ah, but a man's reach should exceed his grasp. Or what's a heaven for? -- Robert Browning -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
