pe, 2010-03-12 kello 15:20 -0800, Jesse Keating kirjoitti: > Keeping that cutting-edge release practice, but adding to that stability > once released would indeed be a very unique and desirable niche for > Fedora to fill. I've avoided participating in these threads, since I don't really want to feed a flame war, but now I'll mention that this is something I'd like Fedora to be. I mostly use and contribute to Fedora because it's an RPM/Red Hat style distribution with a strong emphasis on community contributors, free software and upstream. As Fedora is the distribution I'm most familiar with, I've also installed it on some of my family members' systems but lately I've been considering switching those to Ubuntu once the new LTS release comes out. I've taught these people how to update their systems, but I'm always a bit worried that the adventurous updates are going to break something they need to do their daily computing. I have no problem with the new releases being leading edge, I actually quite like that. I can always put the new release onto a USB stick and test that the important stuff is working on a particular system before upgrading, especially since I upgrade other people's systems about once a year, when the old release becomes EOL. But I can't do this sort of testing for the updates being pushed to the stable releases, so I'd like to be able to trust those not to break things, at least to some extent. -- Ville-Pekka Vainio -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
