Al Dunsmuir wrote:
> And turning all releases into rolling branches helps keep things
> sane?
>
> Please call a spade a spade. Without a reduction in churn in the stable
> releases that is what they become and remain until EOL - a rolling branch.
No, a "semi-rolling" branch, as in a branch which picks up rolling feature
upgrades WITHOUT the disruption and breakage inherent to a rolling branch,
which instead only happens from one release to another. In other words, the
best of both worlds (release-based and rolling).
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
