Friday, March 12, 2010, 7:02:54 PM, Kevin wrote: > Al Dunsmuir wrote: >> Maybe part of the answer is that some resources (especially >> automation) need to be dedicated to keep the core critical components >> of rawhide from being gratuitously broken and staying that way? > An answer to what question? Certainly not to the points I made! > The problem is not with gratuitous breakage, but with breakage inherent to a > rolling branch such as Rawhide. > Kevin Kofler And turning all releases into rolling branches helps keep things sane? Please call a spade a spade. Without a reduction in churn in the stable releases that is what they become and remain until EOL - a rolling branch. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
