Re: Stable Release Updates types proposal (was Re: Fedora Board Meeting Recap 2010-03-11)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/12/2010 11:25 AM, Peter Jones wrote:
> On 03/11/2010 07:18 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
>> Once 4.n+1.0 is out, 4.n.x is no longer updated, there are no further bugfix
>> releases, any bugs in it will stay unfixed. And there are also nice new
>> features in the new version.
>
> So this all boils down to you, the package maintainer, being unwilling or
> unable to actually fix bugs? Is that what you're saying?
>

Umm, is this really the standard we expect to hold package maintainers 
to?  I expect them to be able to communicate the bug to upstream and if 
upstream fixes it provide that fix if it is not too disruptive.  Now I 
have fixed bugs in my packages, and that is a nice thing for a 
maintainer to be able to do, but I'm not sure we are ready to make that 
a requirement.

At least, that is how I interpret the phrase "actually fix bugs".

-- 
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager                     303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA Division                    FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane                  orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Boulder, CO 80301              http://www.cora.nwra.com
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux