Re: Stable Release Updates types proposal (was Re: Fedora Board Meeting Recap 2010-03-11)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 01:15:56AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > You don't see a problem with breaking someone's application just because
> > they've installed an update to a stable release of Fedora? It's
> > obviously fine to do so when upgrading between releases, but within a
> > release it's just gratuitously irritating.
> 
> The application is not broken if whoever built it does his/her job. It's not 
> like there's no notification about soname bumps (when done right; I know 
> some people do not follow procedures, but then that's the problem, not the 
> soname bump).

If the software is not maintained within Fedora, there's no notification 
of soname bumps.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux