On Thu, 11 Mar 2010, Matthew Woehlke wrote: > Kevin Kofler wrote: >> as long as you require only a few 32-bit packages, requesting them >> explicitly is not the end of the world. So if we were to drop support >> for that "always install all libs as multilibs" option > > Eh? I didn't even know there was such an option. And I agree, /that/ > should be dropped. man yum.conf; /multilib_policy it is set to best in fedora. >> and require explicitly picking the wanted 32-bit stuff from the >> 32-bit repo, that shouldn't be a real issue for you. > > As long as I can still install libs to build i*86 on my mostly-x86_64 > system, without yum getting confused and broken, then I'm okay. My > concern is really just the "yum getting confused and broken" part. (I > would prefer to not have to jump through hoops to get i*86 stuff, > though, i.e. having to manually set up a repo would make me unhappy.) the issue is not yum getting confused but really there being some interesting conflicting files.. -sv -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
