On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 08:25:06PM -0500, Seth Vidal wrote: > > > On Wed, 10 Mar 2010, Jonathan Underwood wrote: > > > On 9 March 2010 21:54, Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> =================================== > >> #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2010-03-09) > >> =================================== > >> > >> > >> Meeting started by nirik at 20:00:01 UTC. The full logs are available at > >> http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-03-09/fesco.2010-03-09-20.00.log.html > > > > [snip] > > > > Wow. That has to be the most depressing and apalling read ever - > > seeing FESCo, the steering committee of a project which has done so > > much good and made so much progress, tear strips off each other like > > that. If FESCo is this dysfunctional, I really think there's a problem > > larger than the number of regressions in our updates. FESCo, you > > really need to start working together, you're presently not doing the > > job you were elected to do. > > I agree, there was obviously a divisive and destructive aspect to that > meeting. > > Jonathan, Do you have any thoughts on what we can do to correct it? IMHO the whole discussion lacks "scientific methods" or common sense, e.g. there are no hard facts presented about how each proposal would influence the updates process. E.g. there are no numbers about how many broken updates from testing to stable happend, how often updates are directly pushed to stable, how many people to use updates-testing of F11, F12 and F13? There are nearly no facts, so everyone is just guessing and many people are just ignoring objections. E.g. several proposals require a certain amount of karma, but nobody seems to care, that packages do (did) not get that much comments. And instead of first improving the amount of comments, before taking the next step, it's just ignored. This improved with my script for F12 and F13, but the only available metrics say that the overall amount of comments has increased, but still it is unknown how many packages are how well covered. Regards Till
Attachment:
pgpvUVudkRhLL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
