Hello James, Tuesday, March 9, 2010, 2:53:22 PM, you wrote: > On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 13:41 -0500, Seth Vidal wrote: >> >> On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Michael Schwendt wrote: >> >> > If you - and the QA team - want to expand your testing activities, focus >> > on the CRITPATH packages first. Do a good job there. Nobody from QA has >> > ever given feedback to any of my updates, and it won't happen in the >> > future either. >> >> >> I would not be opposed to the above. >> Make the system work on critpath then mandate it from everyone else. > That's a sensible approach, I don't see any harm in using critpath as > the proving ground. > Thanks, > James I think rather that if it is not important enough to start with critpath, one would wonder how critcal the packages in critpath really are to Fedora. The second thing that I noticed was that common servers and clients (such as mock, ssl, dns, ftp, samba, nfs, http were not considered critical. Why not? Perhaps Fedora needs more layers of critical-ness - critical, high impact, low impact? Al -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
