Re: QA's Package update policy proposal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 13:41 -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> 
> > If you - and the QA team - want to expand your testing activities, focus
> > on the CRITPATH packages first. Do a good job there. Nobody from QA has
> > ever given feedback to any of my updates, and it won't happen in the
> > future either.
> 
> 
> I would not be opposed to the above.
> Make the system work on critpath then mandate it from everyone else.

That's a sensible approach, I don't see any harm in using critpath as
the proving ground.

Thanks,
James

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux