On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 11:41:44PM -0500, Jon Masters wrote: > > I believe that this is possibly too limited. Aside from the obvious > abuse potential (which will always exist no matter what happens) - > obviously someone could just hate the process and decide to have a > couple of others sign off on everything no matter what - I think it > should be necessary to have a cooling off period between pushing an > update, it being voted on, and it going out live. It doesn't have to be > weeks, but it should be long enough for the person who actually reported > some bug to test that it is fixed and for others who aren't able to > devote time every day to see the update. I suggest 3-5 days. > Note -- in the policy as written, there's no possibility of abuse because there's no definition of what karma +1/-1 means. In a different thread someone asked whether we wanted people to simply +1/-1 if the update installed. In another thread, adamw said that QA's bar for acceptance is very low (he had some examples but I'd rather he speak up than I go try to find it in the mailing list archives :-). This needs to be rectified as well. -Toshio
Attachment:
pgp7fzIYMtS7I.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
