On Tuesday 09 March 2010 15:33:35 Jesse Keating wrote: > On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 12:23 +0100, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > > Ok, but then we're stuck in infinite cycle. Some people want to change > > update policies/target of Fedora because of users, we don't know who are > > our user and what they want. Now someone wants to know who are our > > users/what our users really want, we don't want to know it, because we > > don't want to do Fedora for what users want or need, because we're > > developing Fedora for us. Funny ;-) > > Making a change to the stability of our updates isn't just about the > users we have, it's also about the users we want to design for, and want > to have, which we might not have currently because our updates are too > unstable. I've already replied Seth - about users we want. In this case it looks like all catch distro we want = compromise is needed. Current state is not suitable, I agree. But it's not only about updates but also about release schedules - 6 months is not win for these users and about all stuff we want to package, how to support it... It means completely changes in Fedora from top to bottom ;-) Jaroslav -- Jaroslav Řezník <jreznik@xxxxxxxxxx> Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno Office: +420 532 294 275 Mobile: +420 731 455 332 Red Hat, Inc. http://cz.redhat.com/ -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
