On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 11:21 PM, Sven Lankes <sven@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 09:59:29PM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote: > >> Before being added to updates, the package must receive a net karma of >> +3 in Bodhi. > > [...] > >> It is the expectation of Fesco that the majority of updates should >> easily be able to garner the necessary karma in a minimal space of time. > > I don't know what to say. > > If Fesco is aiming at getting rid of all the pesky packagers maintaining low > profile packages: You're well on your way. Very well said. What i clearly miss is the Boards vision given to FESCo. Or am i wrong here and it's FESCo who decides what will happen and the Board says, well yeah, lets try that. We can always clean up and change it after the train wreck? Or does the Board have nothing to do with it at all? Well, a clean up isn't needed if it becomes a train wreck, it will be already cleaned out. Or with other words, is there a statement of the Board, officially making clear what *they* want, with a link to it? What FESCo want is clear meanwhile. By the way, is there some documentation on how to vote out particular FESCo members and who can do it? Just in case one thinks that a particular member of FESCo is wrongly voted in. Or is that like with politicians, once elcected you lost. Same question for Board members. Thanks in advance. P.s. I hope it's clear that this is not trolling, but searching for some clarity on the hierarchy and what the small developer can do if he feels something is wrong. -- LG Thomas Dubium sapientiae initium -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
