Matthew Garrett wrote: > We need to work on making it easier for users to see that there are > available testing updates and give feedback on them. This is clearly > going to take a while, and there'd undoubtedly going to be some > difficulty in getting updates for more niche packages through as a > result. If people have further suggestions for how we can increase the > testing base then that would be awesome, but the status quo really > doesn't seem sustainable. Perhaps as a data-point, before Till's recent easy-karma script, I'm not sure any update of the git package ever received enough karma to be automatically moved to stable. It's not like git is a package no one around here uses. That said, I don't disagree with the goal of pushing packages through updates-testing. I'm just unsure if lesser used packages will ever get out of updates-testing. Maybe >= 3 karma or 2-3 weeks would suffice? -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Some people are like Slinkies... not really good for anything, but you still can't help but smile when you see one tumble down the stairs.
Attachment:
pgppHRBiVytyF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
