On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 10:31 PM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote: >> We have various different definitions of the Alpha, it seems. The >> working definition that QA / rel-eng have always worked on when deciding >> whether to ship it is, broadly, 'can you install it, boot it, get a >> network connection, and install updates'. That's what the current Alpha >> release criteria and validation tests aim to explicitly codify and >> verify. > > But it also fails that definition and this was ignored just because it > didn't happen in the GNOME spin (which will always be the GNOME spin, not > the "desktop spin", but *A* desktop spin; FESCo, the Board or any other > committee deciding otherwise doesn't change this, it's like deciding that > apples are "fruit" and any other fruit can only be an "orange fruit", a > "pear fruit" etc., but not a "fruit" because only apples are that). :-/ > > Kevin Kofler > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > I apologize in advance to all those who this might offend. Kevin, please stop being such an ass all the time. I mean really, just give it a rest. We get it, you *love* KDE and that's awesome but just because its not everyone's preference doesn't mean everyone is out to take KDE down. Maybe take some of this energy you spend starting Gnome vs. KDE flame wars (or trying to at least) and get more people involved in the KDE SIG. Get contributors interested and make then want to help contribute towards making the KDE experience in Fedora the best it can possibly be. -AdamM -- http://maxamillion.googlepages.com --------------------------------------------------------- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
